Thomas Cecil
"Doc" Miller, Esquire was assigned to me, by
Judge Leland Anderson, whilst I was held as a
political prisoner in
the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office's Prison for Profit in famous Golden, Colorado,
home to pervasive government crime and cover-ups.
He was paid by
the STATE to get me out of jail, pronto, so that all the inmates would take
"deals" rather than going to trial, not file appeals when they were unjustly
"convicted" nor to sue aberrant government officials operating in excess of
their authority and/or committing crimes against the People unlawfully
incarcerated in their Prisons for Profit.
At that point,
I had been held without arraignment for over 11 months, denied motions hearings,
reasonable bond, had court-ordered psychological evaluations and forced to live
in deplorable, overcrowded prison conditions, and although un-tried and
un-convicted, forced to co-habit a 7' x 13' jail cell
with every Felon who came
through the Jefferson County Prison for Profit.
T. Cecil
"Doc" Miller, Esquire ultimately coerced me into accepting a plea-bargain under threat of being forced to
remain in prison for another year while he studied the case and 'came up to
speed' for trial. Cecil and Marleen M. Langfield, Esquire of the Colorado
State Attorney General's Office then conspired to prevent me from continuing the
Four Federal Civil Rights Actions against criminal Government officials by
making it a condition of my 'probation' that I would drop the current suits and
not file anymore actions during the two year probation period. 42 U.S.C.
1983 {the Anti Ku Klux Klan laws} has a two-year statute of limitations.
When the
Private Investigator revealed the criminal
conspiracy {18 U.S.C. 241 & 242 and 1961} and reported it to the Judge, all
hell broke loose.
This is the
story of lies, deceit, criminal acts and the
cover-ups documented by the actual
filings in the several related cases. The government's criminal actions
continue to this date with the full knowing aid and assistance of Thomas Cecil
"Doc" Miller and his long-time associate Kevin Massaro and is documented by
court records at:
www.felonyforgiveness.com.
As
the un-lawful debacle progressed, Marleen
Langfield notified "Doc" Miller that he had made a mistake, but that warning
went ignored. It became increasingly obvious that "Doc" Miller's agenda
was to gain a conviction that would impeach any testimony that I may offer
against governmental criminal tortfeasors. Although "Doc" Miller's record
confirms that he is an abysmal attorney, there is no excuse for the fact that he
knew that the case that had been dismissed was the Arapahoe County case for
"felony-faxing" before the Most Honorable Richard A.
Jauch, not 97M811, which had indeed been dismissed by the
less-than-honorable Tina Olsen, esquire but had been unlawfully re-instated by
the un-prosecuted felon, Jefferson County
District Attorney David J. Thomas, Esquire without legal authority as
confirmed by the official Discovery in case #04CR2451 provided by State Attorney
General Investigator Gay Clyman.
Documentation:
in the court's file
Criminal
Conspiracy
Criminal Attorney
Civil Attorney
Supreme Court
Thomas Cecil "Doc" Miller Contact information:
- Telephone
- 303-484-8229 - Answering
service
- 303-422-8065 - Home
- CellPhone:
- 720-422-6502
- FAX:
720-565-3785
Mailing Address:
24 E. Ellsworth Ave.
Denver, Co 80209
Electronic mail
{Thomas C. Miller refuses to
communicate by email anymore, but can be contacted through Judith.}
Significant Other: Judith Z. "Cookie"
Phillips
juphillips@comcast.net
Ramsey Family Photographer / X-Husband,
Robert Phillips ~ Ramsey Attorney
Thomas Cecil "Doc" Miller has an attorney:
Kevin Massaro Reg. No.24682
3780 S. Broadway, Suite 111
Englewood, CO 80113
Phone: 720-981-4627
FAX: 720-834-2425
An Email received 1-27-2006 from a
concerned individual and a reply from Chas Clements:
Chas: Happy Saturday all:
Mr. Dan-
Dan:>>It's actually hard to see why you're upset with
Tom.
Gartin:>I will make it a point to clarify those issues, thank you!
Dan: >>You seem to be a little too anxious to tell
the world why you are upset
with many things.
Chas: It's always amusing which people are more
concerned with (our) emotional
perspective than speaking to Tom's conduct, or its immediate reflection of
the state of our legal system and the outrage it should precipitate.
Tom operated 'DocsLaw', ostensibly a specialty lawfirm staffed by three
'Docs', but he failed to register it or operate it within the laws of the
State or the Bar Association. Every moment spent with them was predicated
on a lie and a confidence game in furtherance of a fraud to cover direct
criminal misconduct by officials in positions of public trust misusing
their authority.
That's not said in anger. It just sounds angry because the objective
statement of fact is so ugly.
Tom, the defense attorney, colluded with the prosecutor against the
interests of his client Gartin. He was aided by other members of DocsLaw
to conceal his agreement with the prosecutor in his own interests, and the
illegality of the stipulation to refrain from suing.
Tom colluded with the complaining witnesses in 00CR3371, themselves
criminals including an attorney, another fact concealed by his
'staff'/associates to cover a fatal conflict of interests with his
clients.
Tom kept the lies going until statutes of limitation had expired to enable
the other crooks to slide. He and his associates were able to maintain the
charade for two years, and enjoyed the benefits of money and services at
our expense.
Tom accepted a retainer from me, and had to tell me the same lies he was
telling Gartin. He and his associates kept the lies going for two years and
never
did a jot of work on my behalf- they took my money and my
services-forward, and never meant to attend their obligations at all.
The fraud is exacerbated by the fact that my complaints were about
'witness intimidation/tampering'; about extortion, about defamation and
character assassination of a witness; about abuse under color of authority
by officials going right into the State Appeals Court and the Attorney
General's office.
I was a Third-Party Witness- not a principal to anything, although more
convinced of Gartin's interests as the pattern of abuse developed over a
dozen years or more and began to include me as a target.
Our system protects the judge, the jury, the prosecutor, the Witnesses-
this should outrage everybody who values the integrity of the law, because
it was the administrators of that system that perverted the system for
their own criminal interests.
Tom committed further criminal acts in order to distract his victims from
what he was doing for the other criminals in the conspiracy- the present
manufactured forgery beef a good example; his conduct in my domestic case
another, pressing drugs on Pamela,....
Tom/staff told 'secondary' lies to support his primary lies- lied about
'West Nile' (covering missed court dates and lace of due diligence); lied
about credentials, lied about the applicable law or body of fact, lied
about work/work product, and the list goes on a mile.
Dan: >>Don't get me wrong, but you appear to have a
large chip on your shoulder
and I don't think this is what you want to portray... is it?
Chas: Again, where's the outrage against
Doc/cohorts?
No professional has stepped forward to demand an accounting from him/them.
No law enforcement officer will proceed, no prosecutor will proceed; no
judge seems ready to sanction him- right up to the Chief Disciplinary
Justice of the Colo. State Supreme Court for just professional discipline,
much less criminal liability.
This isn't some psychodrama/therapy situation where the spiritual
well-being of the participants is cogent- we haven't solved the
social/professional/legal problem that Thomas C. Miller personalizes- we
can all 'get over' him later.
Tom's a menace; he's an ethical hyena, a deliberate and malicious crook
acting on behalf of other crooks to do crooked things.
Why do you not find that outrageous- as contrasted with being more engaged
with the 'anger' at such conduct?
Dan: > This was distressing to me, because the Steve I
remember, wasn't this
type of person.
Chas: What do you think changed?
What kind of stimulus would it take to offend anyone, much less a joyful
spirit like Steve or the other handful of Tom's clients/associates/staff
that're suing him or preferring criminal charges against him, to such a
degree as to engender such an attitude?
And, what emotion would you find more appropriate?
Without being maudlin, Tom's conduct affected every aspect of my life. He
only represents the tool of the 'Defendants', but he caused me great pain
and he did it in malice and for a criminal reason, and from a position of
privilege and trust.
What attitude would be more 'reasonable' than righteous indignation?
Your concern is interesting- and I'm interested in what kind of
philosophical position justifies such a priority.
And, if you see Tom- give him a big smootchy kiss and tell him he's been
on my mind.
Thanks.
Chas
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Haley
To: sheriffsteve@justice.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 6:33 PM
Subject: tom miller
Steve,
This is Dan Haley... I met you through Tom Miller. How's it going?
I'm only looking at 15 years or so in prison on this one, so it's going
considerably better than the last jeopardy that was about 135 years if convicted
on all counts.
I just wanted to bring up something that I
noticed on the web. Even though Tom and I haven't been the best of friends over
the past couple of years,
He does seem to wear friends out in short order . . . historically speaking.
I just wanted to comment on some of the stuff
that you put in your "docslaw.com" web site. You may very well have a good
reason to be upset with Tom and plenty to say about that alone, but you make it
clear in your website that you have a much bigger beef in general than with
just Tom.
True, Cecil was my great hope for a renewal of confidence in the legal system.
A criminal enterprise operating in plain view that somehow seems to escape
scrutiny, oversight, or prosecution for its criminal acts. Perhaps they
are correct in terming it the "criminal justice system."
This is bad because this totally removes the
sting in what (I think) you were trying to express against Tom.
I actually have numerous beefs with Cecil, and not all due to his nefarious
interaction in matters relating only to me. For instance, what he and Wally did
to Pamela still weighs heavily on my mind. She did not deserve what he, Wally
and Cookie {Judith Phillips} did to her, and she still suffers the effects to his day. She has
retained an attorney and is suing him civilly and has lodged a criminal
complaint with the Boulder Police Department and a grievance with the Attorney
Regulatory Commission. Chas and Frank have both sued him as well.
Did you really intend to include all lawyers and
our justice system in your statements against Tom?
Yes, actually I did. Cecil was the best I had met to that point in time and he
is a disgrace to any profession, let alone one that holds so great a sway in the
world. I endeavour not to allow my personal experience to paint the entire
profession with a broad brush and maintain the hope that one day I will meet a
competent professional attorney who also maintains a shred of morality . . . but
thus far, each interaction has been met with disappointing results.
It's actually hard to see why you're upset with
Tom.
I will make it a point to clarify those issues, thank you!
You seem to be a little too anxious to tell the
world why you are upset
with many things.
I awoke at 47 in a world I did not recognize. Many, seemingly unrelated,
elements were not as education, logic and an understanding of the founding principles of
this nation would lead a prudent person to perceive. Having sworn the Oath to
Protect and Defend this great Nation from all enemies foreign and Domestic, I
found domestic enemies everywhere. The confusion and disbelief have slowly
dissipated and patterns, associations and the
various seemingly unrelated agendas have emerged into a picture that alarms me
greatly. The challenge is to present each of the interlocking deceptions in a
cognizable perspective that lends itself to a simple understanding. I realize
that I have failed in that task. Highly intelligent people look with
incredulity at the facts established, and
strain to perceive the purpose behind them. Words fail me.
Don't get me wrong, but you appear to have a
large chip on your shoulder and I don't think this is what you want to
portray... is it?
Oh yes, I do. My dream of raising a Family in freedom was dashed completely
over ten years ago. I have not had access to my best friends, my Children in
over a decade. My life has been a living hell and the people at blame are
obvious. If that is a 'chip' ~ I got it! I do, however, also understand that
there is a more effective method to relate
those atrocities and am working on it.
This was distressing to me, because the Steve I
remember, wasn't this type of person. Just giving you my immediate observation
with this site.
Take care,
Dan
Thank you for the kind thoughts Dan; I truly appreciate that sentiment. In
spite of the hardships I endure, it is my habit and training to keep a positive
and loving attitude in my daily life. Most folks haven't a clue what a horrid
existence I live.
I do vent on the web from time to time; and my thoughts and feelings do evolve,
but my moral compass does not fluctuate. I've chosen full disclosure as a means
of self-preservation . . . the more you know, the better you'll understand.
I've taken your advise to heart Dan and I appreciate your sincere observation.
I suppose the fact that I was so completely deceived by Cecil chaffs a bit, but
I'll endeavour to tone it down slightly.
Peace,
Steve www.felonyforgiveness.com
